The French choices are always counterintuitive

The France may have political head, but policy still has the economic head. Everyone understands the people behind the scenes and the "soundbites" games, but this cannot last. A day should emerge from the behind the scenes to say large. These "key phrases", this program, can be summarized in a slogan, with a thinking behind. "Quiet strength" said change without worry, "Fracture" is the social, "Break" method. Each time, it is to analyze and propose changes, with a rhythm. And "Duty of victory" is true for all.

Because, today, it must be recognized that the France must choose its objectives and its method, i.e. its strategy. The "no" to the Constitution it has weakened in the European debate: Europe continues to move forward under the double aegis English and German. Its economic results make it particularly dependent on others, with a powerful internal growth (around 3), but negative results in the trade. They are losing 1 growth to bring it to 2, sales where the use takes off. Therefore, instead of addressing the subject of growth by the wings left (them "behind", pollution or inequality), instead of focusing on the "without" (unemployed, undocumented migrants, sans-diplôme, sans-protection...), would be better to go to the "with" asking how to make them stronger and more numerous. He cannot be here to an approach where economic growth is central, with the ambition to gain 1 for the France, to 3.

First, it is possible in a world that is growing at 4. This involves a simple slowdown in our loss of market share to the new Giants (China, Brazil) and the new unions (in Asia or Latin America), but already not obvious to obtain. Then, grow more, is better choose, not to disperse, forward faster. Competitiveness clusters show the way with a necessary affiliation in schools and universities grouped with more powerful companies, SMEs more dynamic and less administrative and political complexities. It is also less lost in international trade, with more integrated, fast, and effective export structures. Is having SMEs who run these gazelles that show the way and not despair to fill in papers or be too fiscalisées. Is having a youth who attempts, innovates, moves, with companies which integrates them better and earlier in internships and qualifying training and which include also must give working paths more long to senior citizens, better training and adapting their activities.

The French choices are always counter-intuitive. Our country strives to demonstrate to others that to grow more, need to have more internal application ("relaunching consumption"), work less (retirement at age 60, 35 hours), or increase public services to private, or even put wolves in sheep to establish a new cohabitation... Other countries, worried or less imaginative, say rather that we need to work more and longer to produce more and better, form that produce more with more research allows to export more, that simplification and public modernization are the basis of effectiveness, that the reduction of the tax levy allows to keep and attract talent... all to more growth and employmentsuch as implicit social commitments of health and retirement.

Why are these truths not here What are "right" or "left", out of the way and means to implement them, and that differentiate correctly title the parties Why is exhaust suggests a "elsewhere" which can be, while our "Insider" sixth power of the world, large operator of research, base of large global companies, succession, nursery has what good care Why to disperse, not see what matters and deal more marginal or the anecdotal to the vast majority of our abilities Is there nothing to say to those who study, work, save, innovate, risk, so they continue, succeed, and more